Skip to content
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Linked In
Fegreus & Broderick

Fegreus & Broderick

  • Services
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate and Estate Admin
    • Trustee Services
    • Litigation
    • Real Estate
  • The Firm
    • Michael Broderick
    • Edward Fegreus
    • Barry Gordon
    • Tatiana Barsukova
  • Contact Us
  • Career Opportunity
  • Services
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate and Estate Admin
    • Trustee Services
    • Litigation
    • Real Estate
  • The Firm
    • Michael Broderick
    • Edward Fegreus
    • Barry Gordon
    • Tatiana Barsukova
  • Contact Us
  • Career Opportunity

Who Gets the Real Estate Sale Proceeds?

By: Michael Broderick
Published: January 21, 2016
Categories:
Uncategorized

Distributing Proceeds of Real Estate Sold by a Personal Representative

Clients often face the following scenario: A Will gifts a certain parcel of real estate to one or more individuals, called “specific devisee(s).” Unfortunately, the Personal Representative must sell that property to pay the estate’s debts and costs.  Are the specific devisees entitled to the balance of the sale proceeds, or do those proceeds get distributed as the decedent’s personal property? Cash is, after all, personal property.

Pursuant to M.G.L. c. 204, § 9, the surplus of proceeds of real estate sold by a Personal Representative are considered real estate and disposed of to the same persons whom the real estate, if not sold, would have descended. In other words, the specific devisees take whatever sale proceeds remain. In legal terms, this is referred to as the “non-ademption of specifically devised real property.”

This rule can be dispositive as to whether certain heirs stand to inherit. For example, in a recent estate, the Testator’s Will provided as follows (with certain information changed):

I give and bequeath the real property at 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield, to my daughter, Lila, if she shall survive me.

I give and bequeath the remainder of my entire estate, whether real, personal or mixed, 20 % to my daughter Lila, if she shall survive me, and 80 % to my son, Brad, if he shall survive me.

Both Lila and Brad survived Testator. Unfortunately, the Personal Representative of Testator’s estate had to sell 742 Evergreen Terrace to pay a number of large healthcare related claims against the estate. The balance of the sale proceeds, after payment of debts, was $200,000. If the proceeds were distributed as personal property (remember the general rule: cash is personal property), Lila would receive $40,000 and Brad would receive $160,000. However, M.G.L. c. 204, § 9, provides that, because Lila was supposed to receive the real estate, she receives the entire $200,000.

Sales of real property by Personal Representatives can be complicated, particularly where personal property is insufficient to pay claims against the estate, and/or where specific devisee(s) object to the sale. If you have questions regarding the sale or management of an estate’s real or personal property, please give us a call today.

Post navigation

Previous: Compensation of Personal Representatives
Next: Insolvent Estates

More Like This

The Ethics of Being a Personal Representative

Settling An Estate With Fairness

Read More

Prince Apparently Left No Will or Plan

The Consequences and Next Steps for the Iconic Artist's Estate

Read More

The Health Care Proxy: A Basic Overview

Understanding How a Health Care Proxy Can Protect You

Read More
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • Services
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate and Administration of Estates
    • Trustee Services
    • Trust, Estate, and Real Estate Litigation
    • Real Estate Conveyancing
  • Insights
  • Notice Regarding Attorney Advertising

Fegreus & Broderick, LLP

21 Custom House Street, Suite 480
Boston, Massachusetts 02110
t: (617) 737-9100 | f: (617) 737-9123
info@fegreuslaw.com

Wondering if you can sell a house out of an estate Wondering if you can sell a house out of an estate? 🏡 Here’s a quick rundown.

A well-prepared estate plan makes selling a property much easier for the Personal Representative (P.R.). If the Will clearly gives the P.R. the “power of sale,” they can list and sell the home without needing court approval or permission from heirs, as long as the sale is in the estate’s best interest (i.e., no sweet-heart deals to friends and insiders).

If the “power of sale” isn't included in the Will, the P.R. has to go through the court, which can add extra time and expense.

If the property is held in a Trust, the Trustee usually has the same ability to sell without court involvement, provided the sale is in the best interest of beneficiaries. 

In either situation, the P.R. or Trustee works with real estate professionals just like any other seller, while the lawyers handle any legal documentation necessary to transfer the title smoothly.
Is a health care proxy the same as a “living wil Is a health care proxy the same as a “living will”?

No. These two documents serve different purposes. A living will provides advance instructions regarding one's medical treatment (particularly end-of-life care) that are to be followed by health care providers. Because the instructions are fixed, there is no need for an agent to act on the individual’s behalf.

A health care proxy (HCP), by contrast, appoints a representative – the health care agent – to make decisions as circumstances arise. This makes the HCP far more flexible than a living will.

It's also important to note that Massachusetts law does not recognize living wills as enforceable. However, an HCP should include “living will” provisions that give non-binding guidance to the agent regarding end-of-life decisions. For this reason, selecting an agent who will respect and carry out your wishes is essential.
Follow on Instagram
Copyright © 2025 - Fegreus & Broderick, LLP | Attorney Advertising
Site designed by Two Row Studio
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.